Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753173AbYJUGZL (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:25:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751754AbYJUGY5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:24:57 -0400 Received: from mail9.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.44]:59967 "EHLO mail9.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbYJUGY4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:24:56 -0400 X-AuditID: 0ac90647-aac4fba00000286d-00-48fd75b5e729 Message-ID: <48FD75AF.6080507@hitachi.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:24:47 +0900 From: Hidehiro Kawai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja-JP; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger@sun.com, jack@suse.cz, sandeen@redhat.com Subject: Re: status of the ext3/jbd error handling enhancement patches References: <48FC081D.60306@hitachi.com> <20081019221331.ddf6b8c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081020124145.GB10698@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20081020124145.GB10698@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2003 Lines: 51 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:13:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> #jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch: double-check this >>> jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch >>> ext3-add-checks-for-errors-from-jbd.patch >>> jbd-test-bh_write_eio-to-detect-errors-on-metadata-buffers.patch >>> >>>They improve filesystem corruption problem and it is needed by >>>mission critical systems. >>> >>>Could you tell me what is your concern (you commented, "double-check >>>this") ? Are there something that I can help? For example, I can >>>provide some SystemTap scripts to help tests. >> >>I forget my reasons for that - would need to go back and review the >>discussions when the patch was first merged. >> >>One of the above patches (I forget which) breaks the build because it >>expects the presence of Al Viro's VFS tree, and that hasn't been merged >>yet. I need to wait and see if that merge will be happening (seems >>unlikely) and if not, rework the patch against mainline. I see. Thank you for your work. > Strange; I don't recall any of the ext4 variants of the error handling > patches requiring Al's VFS tree. And I thought all of them have been > merged into Linus's tree at this point. I checked Al's VFS tree and I found commit 6ac465f99b29f74ca5a62bc32a8772985d9a071b changes codes near where one of my patch changes (in ext3/ext4_quota_on()), but not the same code. > Kawai-san, could you double check and see if I processed all of your > patches and pushed them to Linus? I was pretty sure I had... I confirmed that all of my ext4/jbd2 patches have been merged into mainline. Thank you very much! Regards, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/