Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753668AbYJUUXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751315AbYJUUXJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:59904 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751150AbYJUUXI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:08 -0400 Message-ID: <48FE39FA.9030601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:18 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Kees Cook , jakub@redhat.com, arjan@infradead.org, roland@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for glibc PRNG seeding References: <20081001222706.68E7E1544B4@magilla.localdomain> <20081003001616.GN10632@outflux.net> <20081003004340.GF32682@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20081003052938.GS10632@outflux.net> <20081002225718.6a0d803a@infradead.org> <48E5BAC6.9070007@redhat.com> <20081003145054.GU10632@outflux.net> <20081003145754.GH32682@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20081003173313.GW10632@outflux.net> <48E65964.5020809@redhat.com> <20081003175917.GX10632@outflux.net> <20081021130111.b8d73625.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081021130111.b8d73625.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2164 Lines: 50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Morton wrote: > I read the above changeloglet and read the above-linked page and it's > still 87% unclear to me what this feature does. Something to do with > stack randomisation, apparently. I suppose I could go do further > hunting, but from the quality-of-changelog POV I don't think I should > need to do so. Not stack randomization. glibc needs right after startup a bit of random data for internal protections (stack canary etc). What is now in upstream glibc is that we always unconditionally open /dev/urandom, read some data, and use it. For every process startup. That's slow. In addition Andi mentioned that this use of /dev/urandom might be problematic. I let him explain this. The solution is to provide a limited amount of random data to the starting process in the aux vector. I suggested 16 bytes and this is what the patch implements. If we need only 16 bytes or less we use the data directly. If we need more we'll use the 16 bytes to see a PRNG. This avoids the costly /dev/urandom use and it allows the kernel to use the most adequate source of random data for this purpose. It might not be the same pool as that for /dev/urandom. > It's unclear to me that the random-number issue got sorted out? I think the last patch used the normal function to get 16 random bytes, equivalent to the data used for stack randomization etc. If Andi has concrete proposals for a revamp of the use of entropy in the kernel this can be easily done as an add-on. This patch doesn't make the situation worse, it doesn't deplete entropy more than it happens now. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj+OfoACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHST+gCfTriVvBAdfYNXSPuklog3V47u /2kAnipBxYx7IFZe/M2zc6MOnDZkalSb =JpXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/