Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755480AbYJUUhk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:37:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751764AbYJUUhc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:37:32 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.170]:1228 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750966AbYJUUhb (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:37:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=VWW14W8M9TeXEh6jvsXbF2wsLaKFnWPvPSy7A0Au6ToW6vvU92LJm2MM08fpIJOkyI voJMYw9zdY/8OlBZaKS4W8PAmrtzh9iWCNvM7YPXfsYR0vk7l8yTRwtv5js8nWD4hwaj DVKjdmsay6D7Ilkd6vR2EIlTF5kq4EVZx5oV8= Subject: Re: [PATCH] byteorder: remove direct includes of linux/byteorder/swab[b].h From: Harvey Harrison To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20081021131534.7c084fdb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1224523418.31861.4.camel@brick> <20081021131534.7c084fdb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:37:27 -0700 Message-Id: <1224621447.5768.3.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1387 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:23:38 -0700 > Harvey Harrison wrote: > > > A consolidated implementation will provide this generically through > > asm/byteorder, remove direct includes to avoid breakage when the > > changeover to the new implementation occurs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison > > --- > > Andrew, this hunk seems to have been lost when you sent it to Linus, it's possible > > you applied this on top of the -next tree where this file has moved, but the tests > > tree hasn't been pulled yet. > > > > The rest of the patch went into mainline as 1d8cca44b6a244b7e378546d719041819049a0f9 > > > > Grump. It happens sometimes. People putting stuff into linux-next and > then not merging it into the next kernel. > > Should this be linux/byteorder.h? (Which weirdly doesn't include > asm/byteorder.h). As the implementations all used to live in asm/byteorder.h before consolidating, it needs to be asm until all arches convert. At that time we can do the flip and let linux/ be directly includable. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/