Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752073AbYJVEdu (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:33:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750965AbYJVEdk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:33:40 -0400 Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86]:3009 "EHLO anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbYJVEdj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:33:39 -0400 Message-ID: <48FEAD30.3090906@lougher.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:33:52 +0100 From: Phillip Lougher User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton , sfr@canb.auug.org.au CC: Linux Kernel Development , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Sending patches, against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 17 Hi, I'm about to send another respin of the Squashfs patches. Do I base them against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what? I thought they should be against linux-next, but I've already got one complaint. So, I'm confused, what tree should new patches be based off? Any advice would be useful. Thanks Phillip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/