Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755832AbYJVOX3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:23:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752860AbYJVOXU (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:23:20 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36194 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752888AbYJVOXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:23:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:23:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Glauber Costa , LKML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Max Kellermann Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: do_boot_cpu - check if we have ESR register Message-ID: <20081022142312.GC26372@elte.hu> References: <20081022140009.GA9639@localhost> <20081022141354.GA26372@elte.hu> <20081022141720.GB9639@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081022141720.GB9639@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 38 * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > | > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > | > - apic_read(APIC_ESR); > | > + if (APIC_INTEGRATED(apic_version[phys_apicid])) { > | > + apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > | > + apic_read(APIC_ESR); > | > + } > | > | i'm wondering - is the server there really that old, that it has no > | integrated lapic? I.e. it's an i486 SMP box or so? Or perhaps some > | other, weird SMP box? > | > | Ingo > | > > I was quite wondering too -- it's Xeon server. > > >From http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/20/34 > >> Hardware: Compaq P4 Xeon server, Broadcom CMIC-WS / CIOB-X2 board. > >> Tell me if you need more detailed information. ah, Compaq - how many CPUs does that box support? If it's 8 or more then perhaps they turned off the real local APIC, fudged some chipset glue to emulate APIC functionality and thus were able to use 8 or more of these chips? The built-in lapic would only go up to 4 CPUs. (or maybe even just up to dual, depending on the model) This reminds us that all the is-integrated-lapic checks still matter today. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/