Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:53:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:53:35 -0500 Received: from rakis.net ([207.8.143.12]:7842 "EHLO egg.rakis.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:53:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:53:28 -0500 (EST) From: Greg Boyce X-X-Sender: gboyce@egg To: gmack@innerfire.net Cc: Horst von Brand , Subject: Re: Machines misreporting Bogomips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > The machine is actually slower. That's how I noticed the problem. > > > > Underclocking dosen't seem likely due to the difference in speed. It's 4 > > bogomips instead of 500. The machine is running at about the speed of a > > 386 (I believe that's about right). It almost seems as if someone turned > > off the turbo button. But of course I haven't seen one of those since my > > old 486 :) > > > > -- > > Greg Boyce > > > > > > Could they be running with cache disabled in the bios? > The machine is reporting that the cache is enabled. Even if this was true, I have trouble believing that turning on the cache would result in a 50,000% increase in speed (4 bogomips compared to 500). I have a feeling that I'm going to have to chalk this one up to hardware failure. Another kind soul suggested it could be ECC memory reporting a continual string of 1 bit failures. -- Greg Boyce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/