Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:09:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:09:06 -0500 Received: from zok.sgi.com ([204.94.215.101]:36256 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:08:40 -0500 Subject: Re: O_DIRECT fails in some kernel and FS From: Steve Lord To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ricardo Galli , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <3C5AFE2D.95A3C02E@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C5AFE2D.95A3C02E@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 01 Feb 2002 15:05:38 -0600 Message-Id: <1012597538.26363.443.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 14:44, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ricardo Galli wrote: > > > > After some comments from Oliver Diedrich (editor of heise.de), which told me > > he couldn't make O_DIRECT work on 2.4.17, I tried with different versions and > > file systems: > > > > This is the result: > > > > 2.4.14 - Ext[23] - redhat7.2 glibs: OK (at least the bytes are written) > > 2.4.17 - ReiserFS - Debian Sid : FAILS (0 bytes file, write returns -1) > > 2.4.17 - Ext2 - Debian Woody : OK (bytes written) > > 2.4.17 - Ext3 - Debian Woody : FAILS (0 bytes file, write returns -1) > > > > Oliver Diedrich also told he could make work O_DIRECT with ext3 and 2.4.17. > > > > Is this normal? Does it really work on 2.4.14? Or it doesn't but the kernel > > doesn't avoid caching? > > > > ext2 is the only filesystem which has O_DIRECT support. And XFS ;-) Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/