Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:28:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:28:03 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:8204 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:27:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM Lanstreamer bugfixes To: yoder1@us.ibm.com (Kent E Yoder) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 23:40:41 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Kent E Yoder" at Feb 01, 2002 02:53:43 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > handle adapters which write to one address and read from another for the > same variable? I'm guessing it flushes all writes on a read? This is > exactly what lanstreamer does, and I'm thinking this may have caused > problems before. You probably want to get the actual documentation and read it - there are a set of guarantees that I/O's do not pass one another. A read will not pass a write for example. When you think about PCI as a message passing system in both directions its generally a lot better for your head 8). The guarantees are also defined in terms of PCI functions rather than a single port Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/