Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757731AbYJWQPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:15:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757392AbYJWQPg (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:15:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:60249 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757445AbYJWQPf (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:15:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:16:12 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com, Ingo Molnar , Gautham R Shenoy Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] work_on_cpu: use on x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c Message-ID: <20081023161612.GA21008@redhat.com> References: <20081023005750.D0A11DDEF9@ozlabs.org> <20081023094621.GA7995@redhat.com> <200810240210.31573.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810240210.31573.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 455 Lines: 15 On 10/24, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Can we use smp_call_function here instead? I think you are right, smp_call_function_single() should be fine. But please note I don't really understand this code ;) Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/