Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758852AbYJWTyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:54:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754812AbYJWTy2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:54:28 -0400 Received: from cnc.isely.net ([64.81.146.143]:45031 "EHLO cnc.isely.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754514AbYJWTy1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:54:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:54:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Isely Reply-To: Mike Isely To: Greg KH cc: Alan Stern , Justin Piszcz , Oliver Neukum , Kernel development list , USB list , Mike Isely at pobox Subject: Re: Bug fix for pvrusb2 driver [was: Re: Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)] In-Reply-To: <20081023191543.GA10017@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20081020172914.GA9624@kroah.com> <20081023191543.GA10017@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1822 Lines: 55 On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:27:11AM -0500, Mike Isely wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Will this patch be sent to the -stable group, to fix this regression in > > > 2.6.27? Or should they take Alan's fix instead? > > > > > > > Greg: > > > > I didn't directly answer your question here because I had figured it was > > answered in a previous post on this thread, that Mike Krufky had already > > explicitly asked that it be queued (and added his Reviewed-By tag), and > > that I figured it best not to add yet more noise to an already noisy > > group. > > > > However now I see that this patch didn't get into 2.6.27.3. It's a > > pretty important fix; without it the pvrusb2 driver is worse than > > useless (unless one adds initusbreset=0 as a module option). > > As we were discussing this on Monday, and the review cycle for 2.6.27.3 > started last Saturday, it would have been pretty hard to get it into > 2.6.27.3 :) > > I need to see the patch in Linus's tree first, before it can go into any > stable release. Is it in there yet? If so, please send me the git > commit id and I'll queue it up for the next -stable round. > OK, I understand. As far as I know, Linus has not yet pulled the changes from Mauro (part of a larger set). But that information is a few hours old. I or Mike Krufky will let you know if/when one of us finds out. Thanks for following up. -Mike -- Mike Isely isely @ pobox (dot) com PGP: 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/