Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 02:22:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 02:21:58 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com ([216.148.227.88]:51957 "EHLO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 02:21:48 -0500 From: "Buddy Lumpkin" To: "Alan Cox" , "Adam McKenna" Cc: Subject: RE: should I trust 'free' or 'top'? Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 23:18:30 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >The only kernels you are likely to see that not happen on are >- The 2.4.9 kernel with Rik's patches that Linus didnt take (Red Hat 2.4.9-*) >- 2.4.17/18pre with the rmap11/rmap12 patches >- 2.4.17/18pre with the -aa patched VM (which I believe is also in the SuSE kernel packages) >- 2.2 >The base VM in Linus tree has been broken since before 2.4.0 and while >somewhat better is still that - broken. The major vendors don't ship it for >a reason. Why is this? Is linus working toward what he believes will be a better impementation? Is he just being stubborn? I guess I just can't imagine any reason why he would want large enterprise applications running poorly when there are obvious fixes. Believe it or not, im not trying to start a flame war, just trying to understand the logic. --Buddy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/