Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 03:01:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 03:01:40 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:61105 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 03:01:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 03:01:29 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: David Wagner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Continuing /dev/random problems with 2.4 Message-ID: <20020202030129.B20865@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <20020201031744.A32127@asooo.flowerfire.com> <20020201124300.G763@lynx.adilger.int> <3C5AF6B5.5080105@zytor.com> <20020201152829.A2497@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:33:48AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:33:48AM +0000, David Wagner wrote: > Hmm. I don't quite follow your reasoning. Does the kernel already > perform fitness tests on random data from other drivers? I don't > think so. > > The i810 rng seems much less prone to entropy failure than the data > currently collected from I/O events. Why are fitness tests for it more > important than for the existing entropy sources that are currently in > the kernel? > > What am I missing? The "random" data from the RNG might suddenly become non-random. If you are telling the system you are trusting this source, you better make sure it truly is random. RNGs are different than other entropy sources in the kernel because it's a black box. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/