Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755950AbYJXQTm (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:19:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754203AbYJXQTc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:19:32 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:35624 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752927AbYJXQTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:19:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:19:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Tetsuo Handa cc: greg@kroah.com, , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.27.3 usbcore] Move __module_param_call(nousb) toimmediately after declaration of nousb. In-Reply-To: <200810250026.EGB05240.HJtQFOMSOVOFFL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 26 On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > I succeeded to produce this problem with 2.6.26 . > Thus, at least, it is not a new bug introduced in 2.6.27 . > > Greg KH wrote: > > This really sounds like a compiler bug somewhere, reordering this > > shouldn't "fix" this issue. > > I think so too. > Well, I'm getting more and more confused. > It may be gcc3's bug, it may not be gcc's bug. Why don't you simply look at the output from the compiler? Either the .o file or else the intermediate .s file. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/