Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756036AbYJXQXU (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:23:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752712AbYJXQXB (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:23:01 -0400 Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.137]:56192 "EHLO ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752687AbYJXQXA (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:23:00 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2146 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:23:00 EDT X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <4901EE0F.5000508@cam.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:47:27 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML , eric miao , Liam Girdwood Subject: Da903x regulator driver. Bug? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1687 Lines: 60 Firstly, is lkml the right place to ask questions about regulator drivers? Secondly, though I can't track down any examples, I'm guessing the following is a valid board config for the da903x reg etc. static struct regulator_init_data stargate2_ld8_init_data = { .supply_regulator_dev = NULL, .constraints = { .name = "vdd_mica", .min_uV = 1800000, .max_uV = 1900000, .valid_modes_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE, }, }; /* playing with this ld0 as it only goes to an external connector */ static struct da903x_subdev_info stargate2_da9030_subdevs[] = { { .name = "da903x-regulator", .id = DA9030_ID_LDO8, .platform_data = &stargate2_ld8_init_data, }, }; static struct da903x_platform_data stargate2_da9030_pdata = { .num_subdevs = ARRAY_SIZE(stargate2_da9030_subdevs), .subdevs = stargate2_da9030_subdevs, }; static struct i2c_board_info __initdata stargate2_pwr_i2c_board_info [] = { { .type = "da9030", .addr = 0x49, .platform_data = &stargate2_da9030_pdata, .irq = gpio_to_irq(1), }, }; // and relevant registration code. Now if this is now things are expected to be, there is a bug in regulators/da903x.c in da903x_regulator_probe rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, pdev->dev.parent, ri); should be rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, &pdev->dev, ri); or else you aren't going to get the constraint. I think the first will give you the device of the mfd, not the regulator. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/