Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Set initial default irq affinity to just CPU0
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: galak@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, torvalds@osdl.org, maxk@qualcomm.com,
       tglx@linutronix.de
In-Reply-To: <20081024.161813.193686281.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1224863858-7933-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org>
	 <20081024.161813.193686281.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:33:09 +1100
Message-Id: <1224970389.7654.473.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1200
Lines: 29

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 16:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:57:38 -0500
> 
> > Commit 18404756765c713a0be4eb1082920c04822ce588 introduced a regression
> > on a subset of SMP based PPC systems whose interrupt controller only
> > allow setting an irq to a single processor.  The previous behavior
> > was only CPU0 was initially setup to get interrupts.  Revert back
> > to that behavior.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> I really don't remember getting all of my interrupts only on cpu 0
> on sparc64 before any of these changes.  I therefore find all of
> this quite mysterious. :-)

Well, I don't know how you do it but on powerpc, we explicitely fill the
affinity masks at boot time when we can spread interrupts... Maybe we
should change it the other way around and limit the mask when we can't ?
It's hard to tell for sure at this stage.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/