Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:59:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:58:50 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:31761 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:58:38 -0500 Subject: Re: should I trust 'free' or 'top'? To: blumpkin@attbi.com (Buddy Lumpkin) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:11:43 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), adam-dated-1013023458.e87e05@flounder.net (Adam McKenna), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Buddy Lumpkin" at Feb 01, 2002 11:18:30 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >The base VM in Linus tree has been broken since before 2.4.0 and while > >somewhat better is still that - broken. The major vendors don't ship it for > >a reason. > > Why is this? Linus kept ignoring Rik's patches and making other changes, then at 2.4.10 switched to Andrea's VM and ignored most of the follow up changes that made that one work > Believe it or not, im not trying to start a flame war, just trying to > understand the logic. You've got me there. I don't understand either. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/