Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752825AbYJ0K5Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:57:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752186AbYJ0K5O (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:57:14 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56276 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752083AbYJ0K5N (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:57:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:57:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Joe Damato , linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] x86: Cleanup idt, gdt/ldt/tss structs Message-ID: <20081027105708.GB13895@elte.hu> References: <1224904532-9586-1-git-send-email-ice799@gmail.com> <20081025054018.GU24654@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081025054018.GU24654@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 22 * Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:15:20PM -0700, Joe Damato wrote: > > Hi - > > > > This is my first submission to the kernel, so (beware!) please let me know if I can make any improvements on these patches. > > It looks like you provide one patch per file. You should group some > of them together so that each patch does a functional change and > everything still builds after incrementally applying that patch. The > way you have splitted them will break builds if someone tries to > build after patch 1 for instance. yes, at every step the kernel is expected to build and boot fine. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/