Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S292350AbSBBTDm>; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S292352AbSBBTDc>; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:32 -0500
Received: from quattro-eth.sventech.com ([205.252.89.20]:38916 "EHLO
	quattro.sventech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S292350AbSBBTDN>; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:13 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:13 -0500
From: Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>
To: Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: uhci vs. usb-uhci: which is better?
Message-ID: <20020202140313.P11223@sventech.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>; from pozsy@sch.bme.hu on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:37:24PM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Feb 02, 2002, Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
> What is the difference between the usb-uhci and the uhci modules?
> Are there any cases where only one suitable?
> 
> In short: which is 'better'?

The better one is probably the one that works for you.

JE

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/