Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754245AbYJ0TtZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:49:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752581AbYJ0TtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:49:13 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40459 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752519AbYJ0TtL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:49:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20081027.124848.163119274.davem@davemloft.net> To: zbr@ioremap.net Cc: mingo@elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jkosina@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, efault@gmx.de, rjw@sisk.pl, s0mbre@tservice.net.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20081027193933.GB2590@ioremap.net> References: <20081027113306.5b1d5898@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081027183312.GD11494@elte.hu> <20081027193933.GB2590@ioremap.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1348 Lines: 31 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:39:34 +0300 > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:33:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > The moment there's real IO it becomes harder to analyze but the same > > basic behavior remains: the more unfair the IO scheduler, the "better" > > dbench results we get. > > Right now there is no disk IO at all. Only quite usual network and > process load. I think the hope is that by saying there isn't a problem enough times, it will become truth. :-) More seriously, Ingo, what in the world do we need to do in order to get you to start doing tbench runs and optimizing things (read as: fixing the regression you added)? I'm personally working on a test fibonacci heap implementation for the fair sched code, and I already did all of the cost analysis all the way back to the 2.6.22 pre-CFS days. But I'm NOT a scheduler developer, so it isn't my responsibility to do this crap for you. You added this regression, why do I have to get my hands dirty in order for there to be some hope that these regressions start to get fixed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/