Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753641AbYJ1Mmc (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:42:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752529AbYJ1MmW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:42:22 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:31430 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751988AbYJ1MmV (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:42:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=EsMc8KTHGd5IPNo96PcsV4Y64YqRHjpYSnTm07ESvHc3LgUZC8iQvMGmylXtcOpTJDq+ZBVjC6zfQeaxZiDCwni13y4Pa62GPhSgHXknD4AZwz6D8JfwEnunauDVub6y/UlhJUZjw/KPCTAZ169FnHfYPIF945IxhHcF3Wj2h44= ; X-YMail-OSG: XXLTZeoVM1mw9HMYpU8DLduLC_RpdFPs0F2FXgxGNqe5jVvtwEmBzUmaw9rel1o7moN9KqufOEIo6FuelxptJvHfRHXdCMLW4Hw0Qwc742lHayxPG.mEDjEQ4P8vEO4EvPsTnQZsFytRSAJUWI2rRT7WCOb3.yH9Ej4EXknr7DIsSUEwPOc_RYwZoyEz X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1186 mark_buffer_dirty+0x51/0x66() Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:42:04 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4901F375.3020202@vlnb.net> In-Reply-To: <4901F375.3020202@vlnb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810282342.05172.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 24 On Saturday 25 October 2008 03:10, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Hi, > > During recent debugging session of my SCSI target SCST > (http://scst.sf.net) I noticed many > > WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1186 mark_buffer_dirty+0x51/0x66() > > messages in kernel log on the initiator. I attached the full log of > several of them. > > My target was buggy and I was working on fixing it, but I suppose Linux > should handle such failures more gracefully. In all the cases the target > had one type of failure: it "ate" a SCSI command and never returned > result of it. Right. This is one of the warnings I see in my fault-injection testing. It is fixed by my patch to clean up and improve the page and buffer error handling in the vm/fs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/