Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753997AbYJ2N7b (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:59:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752906AbYJ2N7W (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:59:22 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39167 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752702AbYJ2N7V (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:59:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:59:35 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Adrian Bunk Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumw=?= Porcel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , klausman@gentoo.org, Jesse Barnes , Andrew Morton , rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: [ALPHA] 2.6.28-rc fails to compile Message-ID: <20081029065935.7a5930f9@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20081029134553.GA9108@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <49083361.5060907@gentoo.org> <20081029100356.GA28224@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20081029062741.7400e330@infradead.org> <20081029134553.GA9108@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 30 On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:53 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:27:41AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > Andrew has a patch for this in his tree for a while... I was > > assuming he'd do a patchdump to Linus late in -rc1 but it seems not > > to have happened.. > > The basic problem for the Alpha build errors are circular #include's > (that are anyway a pretty bad thing), and I'm currently attacking > that problem (it seems to be surprisingly easy). > > That's IMHO better than the patch in -mm that uninlines > pci_ioremap_bar(). and in my opinion the uninline is nicer ;) Because that means we can add more checks to it over time without bloating the kernel. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/