From: Andrey Mirkin <major@openvz.org>
To: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [RFC v8][PATCH 0/12] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:45:41 +0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
References: <1225374675-22850-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1225374675-22850-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810301745.45068.major@openvz.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 7174
Lines: 174

Oren,

Can you please check your git server. I can't update to the latest version:

# git-pull
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

git-clone exits with the same error.

Andrey


On Thursday 30 October 2008 16:51 Oren Laadan wrote:
> Basic checkpoint-restart [C/R]: v8 adds support for "external" checkpoint
> and improves documentation. Older announcements below.
>
> The git tree tracking v8 (branch 'ckpt-v8'), and older versions, is at:
> 	git://gorgona.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/linux-cr-dev.git
>
> (or for the latest version -
> 	git://gorgona.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/linux-cr.git)
>
> We'd like to see these make their way into -mm.
> As Dave Hansen put it:
>
> --
> Why do we want it?  It allows containers to be moved between physical
> machines' kernels in the same way that VMWare can move VMs between
> physical machines' hypervisors.  There are currently at least two
> out-of-tree implementations of this in the commercial world (IBM's
> Metacluster and Parallels' OpenVZ/Virtuozzo) and several in the academic
> world like Zap.
>
> Why do we need it in mainline now?  Because we already have plenty of
> out-of-tree ones, and  want to know what an in-tree one will be like.   :)
> What *I* want right now is the extra review and scrutiny that comes with
> a mainline submission to make sure we're not going in a direction
> contrary to the community.
>
> This only supports pretty simple apps.  But, I trust Ingo when he says:
> >> > > Generally, if something works for simple apps already (in a robust,
> >> > > compatible and supportable way) and users find it "very cool", then
> >> > > support for more complex apps is not far in the future.  but if you
> >> > > want to support more complex apps straight away, it takes forever
> >> > > and gets ugly.
>
> We're *certainly* going to be changing the ABI (which is the format of
> the checkpoint).  I'd like to follow the model that we used for
> ext4-dev, which is to make it very clear that this is a development-only
> feature for now.  Perhaps we do that by making the interface only
> available through debugfs or something similar for now.  Or, reserving
> the syscall numbers but require some runtime switch to be thrown before
> they can be used.  I'm open to suggestions here.
> --
>
> Oren.
>
> --
> Todo:
> - Add support for x86-64 and improve ABI
> - Refine or change syscall interface
> - Extend to handle (multiple) tasks in a container
> - Handle multiple namespaces in a container (e.g. save the filesystem
>   namespaces state with the file descriptors)
> - Security (without CAPS_SYS_ADMIN files restore may fail)
>
> Changelog:
>
> [2008-Oct-29] v8:
>   - Support "external" checkpoint
>   - Include Dave Hansen's 'deny-checkpoint' patch
>   - Split docs in Documentation/checkpoint/..., and improve contents
>
> [2008-Oct-17] v7:
>   - Fix save/restore state of FPU
>   - Fix argument given to kunmap_atomic() in memory dump/restore
>
> [2008-Oct-07] v6:
>   - Balance all calls to cr_hbuf_get() with matching cr_hbuf_put()
>     (even though it's not really needed)
>   - Add assumptions and what's-missing to documentation
>   - Misc fixes and cleanups
>
> [2008-Sep-11] v5:
>   - Config is now 'def_bool n' by default
>   - Improve memory dump/restore code (following Dave Hansen's comments)
>   - Change dump format (and code) to allow chunks of <vaddrs, pages>
>     instead of one long list of each
>   - Fix use of follow_page() to avoid faulting in non-present pages
>   - Memory restore now maps user pages explicitly to copy data into them,
>     instead of reading directly to user space; got rid of mprotect_fixup()
>   - Remove preempt_disable() when restoring debug registers
>   - Rename headers files s/ckpt/checkpoint/
>   - Fix misc bugs in files dump/restore
>   - Fixes and cleanups on some error paths
>   - Fix misc coding style
>
> [2008-Sep-09] v4:
>   - Various fixes and clean-ups
>   - Fix calculation of hash table size
>   - Fix header structure alignment
>   - Use stand list_... for cr_pgarr
>
> [2008-Aug-29] v3:
>   - Various fixes and clean-ups
>   - Use standard hlist_... for hash table
>   - Better use of standard kmalloc/kfree
>
> [2008-Aug-20] v2:
>   - Added Dump and restore of open files (regular and directories)
>   - Added basic handling of shared objects, and improve handling of
>     'parent tag' concept
>   - Added documentation
>   - Improved ABI, 64bit padding for image data
>   - Improved locking when saving/restoring memory
>   - Added UTS information to header (release, version, machine)
>   - Cleanup extraction of filename from a file pointer
>   - Refactor to allow easier reviewing
>   - Remove requirement for CAPS_SYS_ADMIN until we come up with a
>     security policy (this means that file restore may fail)
>   - Other cleanup and response to comments for v1
>
> [2008-Jul-29] v1:
>   - Initial version: support a single task with address space of only
>     private anonymous or file-mapped VMAs; syscalls ignore pid/crid
>     argument and act on current process.
>
> --
> At the containers mini-conference before OLS, the consensus among
> all the stakeholders was that doing checkpoint/restart in the kernel
> as much as possible was the best approach.  With this approach, the
> kernel will export a relatively opaque 'blob' of data to userspace
> which can then be handed to the new kernel at restore time.
>
> This is different than what had been proposed before, which was
> that a userspace application would be responsible for collecting
> all of this data.  We were also planning on adding lots of new,
> little kernel interfaces for all of the things that needed
> checkpointing.  This unites those into a single, grand interface.
>
> The 'blob' will contain copies of select portions of kernel
> structures such as vmas and mm_structs.  It will also contain
> copies of the actual memory that the process uses.  Any changes
> in this blob's format between kernel revisions can be handled by
> an in-userspace conversion program.
>
> This is a similar approach to virtually all of the commercial
> checkpoint/restart products out there, as well as the research
> project Zap.
>
> These patches basically serialize internel kernel state and write
> it out to a file descriptor.  The checkpoint and restore are done
> with two new system calls: sys_checkpoint and sys_restart.
>
> In this incarnation, they can only work checkpoint and restore a
> single task. The task's address space may consist of only private,
> simple vma's - anonymous or file-mapped. The open files may consist
> of only simple files and directories.
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/