Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756421AbYJ3Pqx (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:46:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753687AbYJ3Pqp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:46:45 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]:36407 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753562AbYJ3Pqo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:46:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:46:35 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Kay Sievers Cc: Cornelia Huck , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel , Greg KH Subject: Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() Message-ID: <20081030154635.GB3871@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <1225328227.5970.51.camel@nga.site> <20081030103200.438576a1@gondolin> <20081030113831.GA3871@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 33 On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100, > >> Kay Sievers wrote: > >> > >> > From: Kay Sievers > >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() > >> > > >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky > >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck > >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers > >> > >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets > >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me. > > Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't > right, because you did the conversion already. :) > > > Who is supposed to send this upstream and when? > > Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there > soon so it shows up in -next. Just to get this right: it doesn't depend on any other patches and is fine as a standalone patch, right? Sorry, this isn't obvious for me ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/