Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756768AbYJ3PwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:52:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756506AbYJ3Pvw (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:51:52 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:8836 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753953AbYJ3Pvw (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:51:52 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:51:41 +0100 From: "Kay Sievers" To: "Heiko Carstens" Subject: Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() Cc: "Cornelia Huck" , "Martin Schwidefsky" , linux-kernel , "Greg KH" In-Reply-To: <20081030154635.GB3871@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1225328227.5970.51.camel@nga.site> <20081030103200.438576a1@gondolin> <20081030113831.GA3871@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20081030154635.GB3871@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1692 Lines: 39 On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 16:46, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100, >> >> Kay Sievers wrote: >> >> >> >> > From: Kay Sievers >> >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() >> >> > >> >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky >> >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck >> >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers >> >> >> >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets >> >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me. >> >> Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't >> right, because you did the conversion already. :) >> >> > Who is supposed to send this upstream and when? >> >> Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there >> soon so it shows up in -next. > > Just to get this right: it doesn't depend on any other patches and is > fine as a standalone patch, right? > Sorry, this isn't obvious for me ;) The stuff it depends on, we already put into .27. It should not depend on anything not in a released version, yes. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/