Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758213AbYJ3TEU (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:04:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753773AbYJ3TEM (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:04:12 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47658 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754353AbYJ3TEM (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:04:12 -0400 Message-ID: <490A0524.70406@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:04:04 +0100 From: Milan Broz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Leggette CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mikulas Patocka Subject: Re: Kernel panic in kcryptd References: <4909FD3E.8070104@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 916 Lines: 23 Wesley Leggette wrote: >> Snapshots involved in LVM >>> >>> Is it reproducible without snapshots involved? >> Will try. I'm trying to reproduce right now without "bigmem", but >> will stop if that is likely not the case. >> > > Also, I should mention that I'm trying this now (without bigmem) on a > logical volume that doesn't have snapshots. Would this make a > difference even if there are other lv's with snapshots (if they are > not being used)? I think that if there is no IOs running over snapshots, it should be ok for the first try. There is too many layers involved... Maybe it is related to to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11636 Milan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/