Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756277AbYJ3WL3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:11:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751690AbYJ3WLV (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:11:21 -0400 Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.88]:27962 "HELO smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751929AbYJ3WLU (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:11:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=murjOK9iMgMrZCK2l/hTE3NSkptnW/WFmM9O5BY3YAVsBoweXhz87rFNIgtoBoNdxDJDaxPFLslIp4WJKs+7l9ga11HHDpkK9CoBubK5l9eeMiTvE56aQa/UPDA7n4fsmqhGULDgVZ9hWF2HYI16QUCu509x7eVE+WKYuL3EReI= ; X-YMail-OSG: yLqroKEVM1nqOvmHjrYyUwBnLEM21qM363vappz29Mfe_jahlRE8tihwFJpa3Lp9qiL8pEzdJS6oQEbk5l58tdYsYSHRAXYVcP2V3Ae4hbuiLkc17tuPSB0X1LNvGwd0HSFZlh86pAjIskUK2FK2jLUvMTU.kwB8AwkjGYw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Nate Case Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: Reset bogus register values on m41t00 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:11:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1225301377-9092-1-git-send-email-ncase@xes-inc.com> <1225398691.27415.170.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1225402486.27415.177.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1225402486.27415.177.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810301511.18307.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 26 On Thursday 30 October 2008, Nate Case wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 15:31 -0500, Nate Case wrote: > > I'll go ahead and re-spin the patch. > > After thinking about this more, I'm not sure it's right to do anything > more than the "remove legacy probe checks" patch already does. Can you > think of any harm in having the oscillator running with bogus register > values? Not really. If you're content with that patch, I won't worry any more. > Calls to get_time() will return -EINVAL, but that seems to be > the norm for any "bad time" condition. It makes me think that resetting > to a sane time is putting more policy than desired in the driver. That's a very defensible position. It does mean you'll want your userspace to defend against that, but that's not hard. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/