From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
       Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
       Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
       Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:32:21 -0700
Subject: RE: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Thread-Topic: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Thread-Index: Ack5O+51Is9gQk7EQ7SB2DrZCVZuiQBssKNA
Message-ID: <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC46401F518D@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1225175522.1685.57.camel@ymzhang>
 <20081028080327.GB15734@elte.hu>
 <20081028202649.GJ30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081028202649.GJ30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 2226
Lines: 61

>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Siddha
>Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:27 PM
>To: Ingo Molnar
>Cc: Zhang, Yanmin; LKML; H. Peter Anvin; Siddha, Suresh B;
>Roland McGrath; Hiroshi Shimamoto; Yinghai Lu
>Subject: Re: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
>
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 01:03:27AM -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Comparing with 2.6.27, cpu2000 (both float and int) has
>about 13% regression
>> > with 2.6.28-rc1 ﻿on my new-model x86-64 machine.
>> >
>> > I bisected down to below patch.
>> >
>> > commit 0afe2db21394820d32646a695eccf3fbfe6ab5c7
>> > Merge: d847059... 43603c8...
>> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> > Date:   Sat Oct 11 20:23:20 2008 +0200
>> >
>> >     Merge branch 'x86/unify-cpu-detect' into
>x86-v28-for-linus-phase4-D
>> >
>> >     Conflicts:
>> >         arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> >         arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
>> >         include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
>> >
>> >
>> > When I tried to revert it against 2.6.28-rc2, there are
>many conflictions.
>
>Ingo, I will work with Yanmin and report our findings. It is
>interesting to see
>double digit regression on cpu2000 benchmark. My understanding is that
>these benchmarks are not sensitive to signal handling. Also lmbench
>signal handling(lat_sig) has less than 3-4% regression, because of
>added overhead duing signal setup and restore. Context switch
>didn't have
>any noticeable difference, when I measure before.
>

We figured out that this is not related to signals. But to this mismerge here

>  +#define X86_FEATURE_AMDC1E  (3*32+21) /* AMD C1E detected */
> + #define X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY       (3*32+21) /* cpu topology enum extensions */

I had earler sent a patch to fix this.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122341178202930&w=2

But, somehow I don’t see this patch either in Linus's git or in tip.

ingo, hpa: Can you push that patch along.

Thanks,
Venki
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?