Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 05:48:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 05:48:07 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([12.107.208.154]:10142 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 05:47:58 -0500 Message-ID: <3C5E66DB.6B1B2BDC@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:47:55 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com Organization: Red Hat, Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-26beta.16smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mingo@elte.hu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations In-Reply-To: <20020204044055.EF0579251@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > One point that seems to get missed is that a group of java threads, > > posix threads or sometimes forked processes combine to make an > > application. [...] > > yes - but what makes them an application is not really the fact that they > share the VM (i can very much imagine thread-based login servers where > different users use different threads - a single application as well?), > but the intention of the application designer, which is hard to guess. sharing the same Thread Group ID would be a very obvious quantity to check, and would very much show the indication of the application author. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/