Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756496AbYKCOvY (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:51:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753217AbYKCOvG (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:51:06 -0500 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.179]:40059 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756362AbYKCOvF (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:51:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Z441Ki+2eqb8J425QvF2NnkV5GWRYitdQUaXK8/3h1KhohjS+kn/yfra/X7b3Obx/0 R5IfwBSiVKVXGU+O5/C9vMZYhhjC3Yxt5rSmSMADMsz4MO4YPeOLEENeEu67x9BC49XC TvGc4ya3C733gPKin6qbe36+5ODLHtDLQMxTA= Message-ID: <490F0FCF.4060905@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:50:55 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Vecera CC: Krzysztof Halasa , Francois Romieu , Simon Arlott , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev , Edward Hsu , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: r8169 MAC addresses broken References: <490380C8.6070003@simon.arlott.org.uk> <4903947A.3060206@gmail.com> <20081025223443.GA30913@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <4904A7C5.7090801@gmail.com> <20081026174654.GB24790@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <4906E4BE.9050304@gmail.com> <490718C7.3010501@gmail.com> <490EBE83.7030309@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <490EBE83.7030309@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1011 Lines: 24 On 11/03/2008 10:04 AM, Ivan Vecera wrote: > Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 10/28/2008 02:45 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >>> Jiri Slaby writes: >>> >>>>> Same thing if you unplug the battery ? >>>> Thanks, now it seems to be OK. >>> Well, perhaps reverting that patch was a bit premature? >> No, it helped after reverting that patch. I think we don't want defunct 2.6.28 >> with these nics. > I cannot agree. You want defunct r8169 in 2.6.28? Or cannot agree with what? > IMO the problem was in the first version of the patch that didn't > check for invalid (zeroed) MAC address. In this case is necessary to power-off (desktop > case) or unplug the battery (notebook case). I see no updated patch in this thread to test -- am I missing something? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/