Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756695AbYKDQec (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:34:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755377AbYKDQeS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:34:18 -0500 Received: from no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk ([80.176.108.50]:63633 "HELO mailgate.blueteddy.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754720AbYKDQeR (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:34:17 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1011 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:34:15 EST Message-ID: <49107543.5080207@blueteddy.net> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:16:03 +0000 From: Dave Hudson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel J Blueman CC: Linux Kernel , Linux Netdev , Linux Networking Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on? References: <6278d2220811040632u7a36d68ekad5de517fd0671bb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6278d2220811040632u7a36d68ekad5de517fd0671bb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1368 Lines: 36 Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Is it time to enable TCP ECN per default and get the benefits, since > router support has been around and known-about for really considerable > time? > > Perhaps it should be a question of enabling it, and educating people > to disable it if they run into issues, since we'll probably be in the > same situation in 5 years...and it'll be some time before these > kernels hit devices/servers anyway. > > Daniel Unfortunately I think you'll find there are sufficiently large numbers of broken SOHO routers out there that if you try this you'll cause a lot of problems. The problems range from no connectivity to in a few extreme cases routers actually crashing or behaving in very unpredictable ways. Here's one summary that got presented to the IETF about 18 months ago: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/tsvarea-3/sld6.htm When a clueless end-user gets a Linux-enabled netbook that crashes their router while their existing Vista or XP systems appear to work just fine then the Linux network stack will get the blame for being buggy, not the router :-( Regards, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/