Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:52:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:52:22 -0500 Received: from squeaker.ratbox.org ([63.216.218.7]:35335 "EHLO squeaker.ratbox.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:52:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:59:09 -0500 (EST) From: Aaron Sethman To: Kev Cc: Darren Smith , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Dan Kegel'" , "'Vincent Sweeney'" , , Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Re: PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMP network performance In-Reply-To: <200202041848.NAA04094@coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Kev wrote: > Wouldn't have the effect. The original point was that adding the usleep() > gives some time for some more file descriptors to become ready before calling > poll(), thus increasing the number of file descriptors poll() can return > per system call. Adding the time to timeout would have no effect. My fault, I'm not thinking straight today. I don't believe I've had my daily allowance of caffine yet. Regards, Aaron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/