Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754898AbYKEHaA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:30:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751399AbYKEH3q (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:29:46 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49833 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbYKEH3p (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:29:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:29:20 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20081104.232920.150683916.davem@davemloft.net> To: mchan@broadcom.com Cc: linux-kernel@blueteddy.net, daniel.blueman@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20081104.215839.132524253.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 561 Lines: 14 From: "Michael Chan" Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:31:00 -0800 > Assuming ECE and CWR are set infrequently on TSO frames, we still > benefit from hardware TSO most of the time. Why is it the wrong > thing to do? I had forgotten about that aspect, and yes this is a good tradeoff considering that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/