Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289307AbSBEADA>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:03:00 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289299AbSBEACv>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:02:51 -0500
Received: from paloma17.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.17]:8632 "HELO
	paloma17.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S289306AbSBEACg>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:02:36 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Organization: DN
To: Andreas Tscharner <starfire@dplanet.ch>
Subject: Re: New scheduler in 2.4. series?
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 01:02:24 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
        Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20020205000246Z289306-13996+17271@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday, 4. February 2002 22:19, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> Hello World,
> Hello Marcelo,
>
> Is there any chance, that the new scheduler will be in the 2.4 series soon?

I think "we" should start with the "remaining" -aa patches for 
2.4.19-pre1/-pre2, finally...

Yes, I know that I repeate my point, but it is time.

Thanks,
	Dieter
-- 
Dieter N?tzel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/