Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753482AbYKFPt5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751264AbYKFPts (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:48 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:59603 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929AbYKFPtr (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] [RFC] Another proportional weight IO controller From: Peter Zijlstra To: vgoyal@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, Hirokazu Takahashi , Ryo Tsuruta , Andrea Righi , Satoshi UCHIDA , fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , menage@google.com, ngupta@google.com, Rik van Riel , Jeff Moyer In-Reply-To: <20081106153022.215696930@redhat.com> References: <20081106153022.215696930@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:49:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1225986593.7803.4688.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1598 Lines: 41 On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:30 -0500, vgoyal@redhat.com wrote: > Hi, > > If you are not already tired of so many io controller implementations, here > is another one. > > This is a very eary very crude implementation to get early feedback to see > if this approach makes any sense or not. > > This controller is a proportional weight IO controller primarily > based on/inspired by dm-ioband. One of the things I personally found little > odd about dm-ioband was need of a dm-ioband device for every device we want > to control. I thought that probably we can make this control per request > queue and get rid of device mapper driver. This should make configuration > aspect easy. > > I have picked up quite some amount of code from dm-ioband especially for > biocgroup implementation. > > I have done very basic testing and that is running 2-3 dd commands in different > cgroups on x86_64. Wanted to throw out the code early to get some feedback. > > More details about the design and how to are in documentation patch. > > Your comments are welcome. please include QUILT_REFRESH_ARGS="--diffstat --strip-trailing-whitespace" in your environment or .quiltrc I would expect all those bio* files to be placed in block/ not mm/ Does this still require I use dm, or does it also work on regular block devices? Patch 4/4 isn't quite clear on this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/