Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752859AbYKFRnw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:43:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751286AbYKFRnn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:43:43 -0500 Received: from willie.n0ano.com ([64.66.241.76]:41312 "EHLO xolotl.n0ano.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbYKFRnn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:43:43 -0500 From: n0ano@n0ano.com Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:43:41 -0700 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Is the PCI serial driver code GPL v2 or v3 Message-ID: <20081106174341.GA8155@xolotl.n0ano.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 27 I notice that many of the files that make up the serial driver are licensed as "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". Unfortunatley, I would like to use some of the code from `drivers/serial/8250_pci.c' in grub2, which is a GPL v3 project, but the copyright for this file says: * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License. The `either' in that sentence would lead me to believe that there was a typo and the `or later' clause was dropped off but, as it stands, it's just bad English that says version 2 only. Anyone know what the true intent was and how to resolve this? -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale n0ano@n0ano.com Ph: 303/443-3786 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/