Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751962AbYKFSyS (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:54:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751041AbYKFSyH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:54:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:55267 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751005AbYKFSyF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:54:05 -0500 From: Peter Alfredsen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is the PCI serial driver code GPL v2 or v3 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:52:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20081106174341.GA8155@xolotl.n0ano.com> In-Reply-To: <20081106174341.GA8155@xolotl.n0ano.com> Cc: Russell King MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1721112.6vrcq5roqt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200811061952.37490.loki_val@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2139 Lines: 57 --nextPart1721112.6vrcq5roqt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 06 November 2008, n0ano@n0ano.com wrote: > I notice that many of the files that make up the serial driver > are licensed as "either version 2 of the License, or (at your > option) any later version". Unfortunatley, I would like to use > some of the code from `drivers/serial/8250_pci.c' in grub2, > which is a GPL v3 project, but the copyright for this file > says: > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the > License. > > The `either' in that sentence would lead me to believe that there > was a typo and the `or later' clause was dropped off but, as it > stands, it's just bad English that says version 2 only. > > Anyone know what the true intent was and how to resolve this? It seems like a typo to me to.. That wording has been constant since the=20 file drivers/serial/serial_8250_pci.c was created based on work in=20 drivers/char/serial.c: http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git;a=3Dcommitdiff= ;h=3D33c0d1b0c3ebb61243d9b19ce70d9063acff2aac serial_8250.c has the "or later" clause there. But I suppose the best way is to ask the originator of that file.=20 Russell, what say you? Did you mean to license that file under GPL-2 or GPL-2+? =2D-=20 /PA --nextPart1721112.6vrcq5roqt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkTPPUACgkQtEGUx4TfHiTg2wCeLFgBFdoORNRFUCe5aPHAek9V dv4AnRup2tHqRUiY1KKH9V4e2/bk3/MT =HYf9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1721112.6vrcq5roqt-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/