Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 02:34:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 02:34:49 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:43911 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 02:34:35 -0500 Message-Id: <200202042014.g14KE8gL001417@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> To: Keith Owens cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does In-Reply-To: Message from Keith Owens of "Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:34:48 +1100." <15269.1012779288@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 21:14:08 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Keith Owens said: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:42:11 +0100, > Horst von Brand wrote: > >Keith Owens said: > >> I know, it makes it even harder to see what the initialization order > >> is. Some are controlled by the Makefile/subdirs order, some by special > >> calls in the code. > >Just to repeat myself: This is clearly a problem for tsort(1): Give > >restrictions of the form "This has to come after that" (perhaps a special > >comment at the start of the file containing the init function?), tsort that > >and pick the order out of the result. Should be a few lines of script. No > >central repository for the dependencies, no messing around with half the > >world to fix dependencies. Plus they become explicit, which they aren't > >today. > Just to repeat myself: That is exactly what I want to do. Linus vetoed > it in October 2000. Right. And I still think Linus is dead wrong here. IMVVHO. -- Horst von Brand http://counter.li.org # 22616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/