Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754205AbYKGCAw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:00:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750954AbYKGCAm (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:00:42 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:51920 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750894AbYKGCAl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:00:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:58:44 -0800 From: Greg KH To: H L Cc: Yu Zhao , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org, achiang@hp.com, matthew@wil.cx, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, Xen-devel List Subject: Re: git repository for SR-IOV development? Message-ID: <20081107015844.GA11884@kroah.com> References: <20081106165914.GA13476@kroah.com> <104014.9320.qm@web45110.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <104014.9320.qm@web45110.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1405 Lines: 37 On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:58:25AM -0800, H L wrote: > --- On Thu, 11/6/08, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:51:09AM -0800, H L wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone initiated or given consideration to the > > creation of a git > > > repository (say, on kernel.org) for SR-IOV > > development? > > > > Why? It's only a few patches, right? Why would it > > need a whole new git > > tree? > > > So as to minimize the time and effort patching a kernel, especially if > the tree (and/or hash level) against which the patches were created > fails to be specified on a mailing-list. Plus, there appears to be > questions raised on how, precisely, the implementation should > ultimately be modeled and especially given that, who knows at this > point what number of patches will ultimately be submitted? I know > I've built the "7-patch" one (painfully, by the way), and I'm aware > there's another 15-patch set out there which I've not yet examined. It's a mere 7 or 15 patches, you don't need a whole git tree for something small like that. Especially as there only seems to be one developer doing real work... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/