Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756009AbYKGG3g (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:29:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755651AbYKGG2l (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:28:41 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:48957 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755596AbYKGG2j (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:28:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:17:00 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Matthew Wilcox , H L , Yu Zhao , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org, achiang@hp.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, Chris Wright Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support Message-ID: <20081107061700.GD3860@kroah.com> References: <20081106154351.GA30459@kroah.com> <894107.30288.qm@web45108.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20081106164919.GA4099@kroah.com> <20081106174741.GC11773@parisc-linux.org> <20081106175308.GA17027@kroah.com> <49137255.9010104@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49137255.9010104@codemonkey.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1039 Lines: 27 On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:40:21PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Greg KH wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:47:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> >>> I don't think we really know what the One True Usage model is for VF >>> devices. Chris Wright has some ideas, I have some ideas and Yu Zhao has >>> some ideas. I bet there's other people who have other ideas too. >>> >> >> I'd love to hear those ideas. >> > > We've been talking about avoiding hardware passthrough entirely and > just backing a virtio-net backend driver by a dedicated VF in the > host. That avoids a huge amount of guest-facing complexity, let's > migration Just Work, and should give the same level of performance. Does that involve this patch set? Or a different type of interface. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/