To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I2C from interrupt context?
References: <m3bpws8ln3.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
	<20081106.154754.02648408.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20081107101118.286f3713@hyperion.delvare>
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:05:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20081107101118.286f3713@hyperion.delvare> (Jean Delvare's message of "Fri\, 7 Nov 2008 10\:11\:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3bpwrbjxs.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 716
Lines: 17

Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> writes:

> The situation is far from perfect though. For one thing, I seem to
> recall that Andrew Morton didn't like the approach taken in
> i2c_transfer(). For another, i2c_smbus_xfer() was not yet modified so
> at this point only I2C-level transactions can be non-sleeping,
> SMBus-level transactions can't. But all this could be fixed by anyone
> who cares about these specific issues.

Thanks, I'll look at it.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/