Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752782AbYKGWuU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:50:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751171AbYKGWuF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:50:05 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:44714 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbYKGWuE (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:50:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=vXWbf8jwkQAoddtzYzMv8rQKIWoCZmiYgqi0JiBvLKOs2PN+E2hdHzegd19PBQ300S SXlSiobkwRwFAZABUBGO4PouA8PMZpg+cPef/X+LRdoCn1YpKd1LkF7vL74e5lrji9dB zKLoFhVAnzk4d16PgctRN2CEzmg3zOi9PwOw8= Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:50:16 +0200 From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Harvey Harrison , Mathieu Desnoyers , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH-ugly] kmemtrace: casting a gfp_t requires __force Message-ID: <20081107225015.GA5210@localhost> References: <1226084321.11596.37.camel@brick> <20081107192029.GA4001@x200.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081107192029.GA4001@x200.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2319 Lines: 64 On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:20:29PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:58:41AM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > --- a/include/linux/kmemtrace.h > > +++ b/include/linux/kmemtrace.h > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static inline void kmemtrace_mark_alloc_node(enum kmemtrace_type_id type_id, > > "bytes_req %lu bytes_alloc %lu gfp_flags %lu node %d", > > type_id, call_site, (unsigned long) ptr, > > (unsigned long) bytes_req, (unsigned long) bytes_alloc, > > - (unsigned long) gfp_flags, node); > > + (__force unsigned long)gfp_flags, node); > > gfp_t is "unsigned int" actually. These casts are bogus. > > Subject: How do I printk correctly? > > If variable is of Type use printk format specifier. > --------------------------------------------------------- > int %d or %x > unsigned int %u or %x > long %ld ot %lx > unsigned long %lu or %lx > long long %lld or %llx > unsigned long long %llu or %llx > size_t %zu or %zx > ssize_t %zd or %zx > > Raw pointer value SHOULD be printed with %p. > > u64 SHOULD be printed with %llu/%llx, (unsigned long long): > > printk("%llu", (unsigned long long)u64_var); > > s64 SHOULD be printed with %lld/%llx, (long long): > > printk("%lld", (long long)s64_var); > > If type is dependent on config option (sector_t), use format specifier > of biggest type and explicitly cast to it. > > Reminder: sizeof() result is of type size_t. > > Thank you for your cooperation. Hi, Actually, "%zu" was the first thing that crossed my mind too. But we don't want to carry such types into the probe callbacks. It's a lot easier to see which u* an unsigned long fits into than it is for size_t. So we take care of this inside a wrapper; the sooner, the better. Also take into account that debugging code usually casts pointers to unsigned long. This can easily be seen by looking at _RET_IP_ definition or SLAB code. I think there's a very good reason to do so, since it adds opacity to something that's not supposed to be used as a pointer. Cheers, Eduard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/