Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:26:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:26:23 -0500 Received: from natwar.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.70]:6452 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:26:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:22:44 +0100 From: Kristian To: Ingo Molnar Cc: lostlogic@lostlogicx.com, starfire@dplanet.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New scheduler in 2.4. series? Message-Id: <20020205222244.4b763103.kristian.peters@korseby.net> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20020205193856.7628dcb3.kristian.peters@korseby.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0claws5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > if you are using nice -20 tasks then they might take CPU time away from > lower priority tasks. This is why bigger negative nice levels should only > be used sparingly. (and this is why it can only be done as root.) Of course. But with the good old scheduler I've never had any problems. The system was very slow but continuously responsive. (low frequency timeslices between process rotations) With your -J2 patch it's getting really unusable. Maybe I should give -K2 a try. *Kristian :... [snd.science] ...: :: :: http://www.korseby.net :: http://gsmp.sf.net :.........................:: ~/$ kristian@korseby.net : - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/