Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:39:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:39:14 -0500 Received: from www.dhs.state.ok.us ([204.87.68.21]:15116 "HELO www.dhs.state.ok.us") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:39:04 -0500 Message-ID: <66DFB06001CDD211AEC400805F9FBC270E68D527@s99mail02.okdhs.org> From: "Little, John" To: "'Andreas Tscharner'" , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel Mailinglist Subject: RE: windows is more secure than linux!! Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:35:50 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >From the security focus website : Several things should be taken into consideration when interpreting these numbers: These numbers are dated; the collection and calculation of data stopped in early August 2001 due to a site migration issue. We are currently working on this issue and should have it resolved in the near future. There is a distinct difference in the way that vulnerabilities are counted for Microsoft Windows and other operating systems. For instance, applications for Linux and BSD are often grouped in as subcomponents with the operating systems that they are shipped with. For Windows, applications and subcomponents such as Explorer often have their own packages that are considered vulnerable or not vulnerable outside of Windows and therefore may not be included in the count. This may skew numbers. This is a simple raw count of the vulnerabilities in our database that are associated directly with an operating system. The factors mentioned above were not taken into consideration when generating these graphs. The numbers presented below should not be considered a metric by which an accurate comparison -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Tscharner [mailto:starfire@dplanet.ch] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:19 PM To: Rik van Riel; Linux Kernel Mailinglist Subject: Re: windows is more secure than linux!! On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:41:42 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: [snip] > > www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=16886&u_id=623 > > Now add the security holes in ISS, Outlook, Exchange, > Access and all available pieces of Windows software > into the picture so Linux and Windows are measured on > an equal ground. You don't even need to... >From http://lwn.net/daily/ "Somebody needs to point out to them that they are counting the same vulnerabilities four times." Regards Andreas -- Andreas Tscharner starfire@dplanet.ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/