DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=HqmSS+FrfuTz4zlvrabI6sLZI1SXLljACIovtpfv25KfZpCuDvKP3fdsAez2pHwTyK
         SNb2SgIoLmBk913wI1Np9Jp7Vmaiexk6ul4ga3PqLsen8m3TOggzf6InKMawHgYKci86
         Mqrd8Pzjvl1oDySMkfMkCbtTLA8EKZoXoScfI=
Message-ID: <b0438a630811100347s2d228f2cu26610f7279eb083f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:47:14 +0100
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_=C1ngel_=C1lvarez?=" <gotzoncabanes@gmail.com>
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: EHCI "on the go"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 990
Lines: 25

Hi.

Due to some problems with the EHCI in an IXP465, I have found that
this micro has an "on the go" feature. One of its features seems to be
an "Embedded Transaction Translator", that seems to be quite
"propietary".

I see in ehci.h, that using CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT, a function
called "ehci_port_speed" has been added, and the comments suggest to
implement the particularities of each controller with other functions.

The question is:
- Are there many different implementations (it seems there are not,
because I cannot see code for each of them... unless they are so
particular that they do not even use the general interface)?
- Is there any place comparing the similarities / differences between them?

Thanks

Miguel ?ngel ?lvarez
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/