Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753506AbYKKQU0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:20:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751854AbYKKQUM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:20:12 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54975 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047AbYKKQUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:20:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:20:50 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Jiri Pirko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] atkbd: cancel delayed work before freeing its structure Message-ID: <20081111172050.GC18214@redhat.com> References: <20081105153140.25132ca1@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com> <20081107154325.GD9368@redhat.com> <20081111145155.GA24881@anvil.corenet.prv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081111145155.GA24881@anvil.corenet.prv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1443 Lines: 32 On 11/11, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:43:25PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > While we are here, what is the reason for atkbd_schedule_event_work()->wmb() ? > > It looks absolutely bogus. Is it for atkbd_event_work() ? In that case it > > is not needed, it must see all previous STOREs because both queue_work() and > > run_workqueue() take cwq->lock. And in any case, > > test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING) implies mb(). > > I wanted to be sure that event_mask is set before we schedule event_work > and I don't want to rely on details of queue_delayed_work > implementation. If the fact that queue_delayed_work acts as a barrier > would be listed part of its published spec I would gladly remove wmb() > from atkbd. Yes, queue_delayed_work() acts as a barrier for the work->func(), otherwise almost any code which uses wqs is broken. But let me repeat, if queue_delayed_work() fails becuase this work is already queued we (in this particular case) need mb(), not wmb(). Or atkbd_schedule_event_work() can miss a bit in ->event_mask. So I think this wmb() is misleading. And unneeded because queue_work() implies mb(), but this is not really documented. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/