Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753742AbYKLNzi (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:55:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751639AbYKLNz0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:55:26 -0500 Received: from bigben2.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.81.132]:48292 "EHLO bigben2.bytemark.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbYKLNzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:55:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:55:22 +0000 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] checkpatch: Add warning for p0-patches Message-ID: <20081112135522.GD8302@shadowen.org> References: <1225467370-19143-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1225467370-19143-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1948 Lines: 50 On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:36:10PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Some people work internally with -p0-patches which has the danger that > one forgets to convert them to -p1 before mainlining. Bitten myself and > seen p0-patches in mailing lists occasionally, this patch adds a warning > to checkpatch.pl in case a patch is -p0. If you really want, you can > fool this check to generate false positives, this is why it just spits a > warning. Making the check 100% proof is trickier than it looks, so let's > start with a version which catches the cases of real use. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 +++++++- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index f88bb3e..dae5854 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -1051,6 +1051,7 @@ sub process { > my $in_comment = 0; > my $comment_edge = 0; > my $first_line = 0; > + my $p1_prefix = ''; > > my $prev_values = 'E'; > > @@ -1196,7 +1197,12 @@ sub process { > # extract the filename as it passes > if ($line=~/^\+\+\+\s+(\S+)/) { > $realfile = $1; > - $realfile =~ s@^[^/]*/@@; > + $realfile =~ s@^([^/]*)/@@; > + > + $p1_prefix = $1; > + if ($tree && -e "$root/$p1_prefix") { > + WARN("Patch prefix '$p1_prefix' exists. Is it maybe a p0-patch?\n"); > + } > > if ($realfile =~ m@^include/asm/@) { > ERROR("do not modify files in include/asm, change architecture specific files in include/asm-\n" . "$here$rawline\n"); Looks reasonable. Committed this with a few mods to my tree. Will be in the next batch of updates. -apw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/