Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753696AbYKMDXa (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:23:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751557AbYKMDXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:23:21 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:55078 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbYKMDXU (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:23:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:22:41 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp, Paul Menage Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir Message-Id: <20081113122241.b77a0d14.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <491B9BB3.6010701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20081112122606.76051530.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081112122656.c6e56248.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081112160758.3dca0b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081113114908.42a6a8a7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <491B9BB3.6010701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1463 Lines: 43 On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:44:59 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:07:58 -0800 > > Andrew Morton wrote: > >> If we do this then we can make the above "keep" behaviour non-optional, > >> and the operator gets to choose whether or not to drop the caches > >> before doing the rmdir. > >> > >> Plus, we get a new per-memcg drop_caches capability. And it's a nicer > >> interface, and it doesn't have the obvious races which on_rmdir has, > >> etc. > >> > >> hm? > >> > > > > Balbir, how would you want to do ? > > > > I planned to post shrink_uage patch later (it's easy to be implemented) regardless > > of acceptance of this patch. > > > > So, I think we should add shrink_usage now and drop this is a way to go. > > I am a bit concerned about dropping stuff at will later. Ubuntu 8.10 has memory > controller enabled and we exposed memory.force_empty interface there and now > we've dropped it (bad on our part). I think we should have deprecated it and > dropped it later. > I *was* documented as "for debug only". Hmm, adding force_empty again to do "shrink usage to 0" is another choice. ok? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/