Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752246AbYKMIic (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:38:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751006AbYKMIiY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:38:24 -0500 Received: from mail4.iitk.ac.in ([203.197.196.4]:43516 "EHLO mail4.iitk.ac.in" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750824AbYKMIiX (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:38:23 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 656 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:38:23 EST Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:34:06 +0000 From: Rahul Pydimukkala To: kyle Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: apache threads not balanced over all CPU cores, schedular problem or apache? Message-ID: <20081113143404.GC12750@csews22.cse.iitk.ac.in> References: <009401c9454c$6e3a8610$b902a8c0@kyle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009401c9454c$6e3a8610$b902a8c0@kyle> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 21 On 12:58 Thu 13 Nov , kyle wrote: > Hi, > > Please cc me if possible. > > I have a machine with Intel Q9300 4-core CPU, 8GB RAM. It runs apache 2.0.63 > with traditional prefork MPM. Yes, this is quite undesirable given that the kernel has a good load-balancer. Can you give more information regarding the kernel version and load stats of individual apache processes as well? - Rahul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/