Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S290605AbSBFPWH>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:22:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S290607AbSBFPV5>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:21:57 -0500
Received: from mail.cert.uni-stuttgart.de ([129.69.16.17]:26045 "HELO
	Mail.CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S290605AbSBFPVn>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:21:43 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0202051928330.2375-100000@cesium.transmeta.com>
From: Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:17:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0202051928330.2375-100000@cesium.transmeta.com> (Linus
 Torvalds's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:37:41 -0800 (PST)")
Message-ID: <87g04eljw6.fsf@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:

> The long-range plan, and the real payoff, comes if main developers start
> using bk too, which should make syncing a lot easier. That will take some
> time, I suspect.

Do you think that at some point, using BitKeeper will become mandatory
for subsystem maintainers?  ("mandatory" in the sense that
non-BitKeeper input is dealt with in a less timely fashion, for
example.)

-- 
Florian Weimer 	                  Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
University of Stuttgart           http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
RUS-CERT                          +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/