Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752143AbYKNCUX (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:20:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750984AbYKNCUJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:20:09 -0500 Received: from smtp120.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.77]:44246 "HELO smtp120.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750948AbYKNCUH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:20:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=10g3ACSjluC7cyJxfOt9ubxw8UFtMblcuPuWnViDZsccrgtNuHlzHR8GX/mPty+EkGytEeloSPJ922o3LvR7UosCwYnyO2oNpC6zPU6ZhHo3I5Rx7/zZYp7ezNXXZvrnb81a2Vu1yyFqKdb5uFGvl9v3wR1di2vQ837Dsclz6ec= ; X-YMail-OSG: 4.JES6MVM1k.PWq9iSJfR7umn6mNg_RcoAlV2kfJUL58qi7PmUXg61QSm.Sz4PxqbOSwCkldEP3EWmdkfBnnBLv_lX6Wo61OeCidEQi3bESX0hf6af8M_Ale26cynkV0s.J7Rb33VDHc7oCSHAVfj.e_TUeYMdf6t0GjYIf2MRHGOxsEYjzcjuOgEIAf X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: implement remap_pfn_range with apply_to_page_range Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:19:56 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" References: <491C61B1.10005@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <491C61B1.10005@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811141319.56713.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4368 Lines: 146 On Friday 14 November 2008 04:19, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > remap_pte_range() just wants to apply a function over a range of ptes > corresponding to a virtual address range. That's exactly what > apply_to_page_range() does, so use it. This isn't performance critical to anyone? I see DRM, IB, GRU, other media and video drivers use it. It IS exactly what apply_to_page_range does, I grant you. But so does our traditional set of nested loops. So is there any particular reason to change it? You're not planning to change fork/exit next, are you? :) > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge > --- > mm/memory.c | 92 > ++++++++++++----------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, > 20 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > > =================================================================== > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -1472,69 +1472,20 @@ > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_insert_mixed); > > -/* > - * maps a range of physical memory into the requested pages. the old > - * mappings are removed. any references to nonexistent pages results > - * in null mappings (currently treated as "copy-on-access") > - */ > -static int remap_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, > - unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) > +struct remap_data { > + struct mm_struct *mm; > + unsigned long pfn; > + pgprot_t prot; > +}; > + > +static int remap_area_pte_fn(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, > + unsigned long addr, void *data) > { > - pte_t *pte; > - spinlock_t *ptl; > + struct remap_data *rmd = data; > + pte_t pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(rmd->pfn++, rmd->prot)); > > - pte = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); > - if (!pte) > - return -ENOMEM; > - arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - do { > - BUG_ON(!pte_none(*pte)); > - set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(pfn, prot))); > - pfn++; > - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); > - arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); > - pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl); > - return 0; > -} > + set_pte_at(rmd->mm, addr, ptep, pte); > > -static inline int remap_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, > - unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) > -{ > - pmd_t *pmd; > - unsigned long next; > - > - pfn -= addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > - pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr); > - if (!pmd) > - return -ENOMEM; > - do { > - next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end); > - if (remap_pte_range(mm, pmd, addr, next, > - pfn + (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT), prot)) > - return -ENOMEM; > - } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end); > - return 0; > -} > - > -static inline int remap_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd, > - unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) > -{ > - pud_t *pud; > - unsigned long next; > - > - pfn -= addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > - pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, addr); > - if (!pud) > - return -ENOMEM; > - do { > - next = pud_addr_end(addr, end); > - if (remap_pmd_range(mm, pud, addr, next, > - pfn + (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT), prot)) > - return -ENOMEM; > - } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end); > return 0; > } > > @@ -1551,10 +1502,9 @@ > int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot) > { > - pgd_t *pgd; > - unsigned long next; > unsigned long end = addr + PAGE_ALIGN(size); > struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; > + struct remap_data rmd; > int err; > > /* > @@ -1584,16 +1534,14 @@ > vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP; > > BUG_ON(addr >= end); > - pfn -= addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > - pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr); > - flush_cache_range(vma, addr, end); > - do { > - next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end); > - err = remap_pud_range(mm, pgd, addr, next, > - pfn + (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT), prot); > - if (err) > - break; > - } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end); > + > + rmd.mm = mm; > + rmd.pfn = pfn; > + rmd.prot = prot; > + > + err = apply_to_page_range(mm, addr, end - addr, > + remap_area_pte_fn, &rmd); > + > return err; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/